The upcoming vote among MCC members on accepting a 51 percent share in the London Spirit franchise for the Hundred has stirred up mixed reactions. On paper, the offer sounds appealing. The MCC would gain a majority share at no cost, allowing them to have a say over future investors in the remaining 49 percent and, potentially, benefit financially.
This financial gain could fund upgrades to the club’s facilities, such as the Tavern and Allen stands. If things don’t go as planned, the MCC could sell its stake, provided members agree.
Meanwhile, other host clubs are offering similar stakes, with new investors expected to bring “fresh” money into the game. In this setup, each club would control its franchise while limiting financial risk due to the entity’s separate legal standing. According to the MCC, the only possible downside would be reputational risk, depending on the investors they align with.
MCC members Voting for The Hundred Share
However, as an MCC member, I feel strongly about voting against this resolution, disagreeing with the committee’s endorsement. This stance isn’t out of stubbornness but because this venture doesn’t align with the MCC’s standing. Many of us feel the club should be cautious, given the risks in associating with the England and Wales Cricket Board (ECB), which has been driving the Hundred. The ECB’s track record has shown a focus on profit over the broader good of the game. Moreover, there’s a sense of close ties between senior MCC and ECB figures, which raises questions about independence in this decision. Many, including myself, worry the Hundred will struggle to coexist with the globally popular T20 format, which has gained traction even in markets like the U.S., whereas the Hundred’s future feels uncertain.
Broadcasting rights Until 2028
Sky Sports has committed to broadcasting the Hundred until 2028, which implies a temporary support window. The ECB hopes the Hundred will gain a global following by then, but that seems doubtful. T20, with the support of Indian investment and viewership, dominates the cricketing world, and its international reach overshadows the Hundred. While the Hundred might catch on in topic markets, it is unlikely to become a global phenomenon.
MCC Reservation on Financial Outlook
From a scheduling standpoint, it seems impractical for both the Hundred and T20 to thrive together long-term. MCC may be eyeing short-term profits, but this approach is inherently risky and could leave the club Complications in a venture that lacks long-term. Many members feel this decision is like signing a “blank cheque,” as there are not enough concrete details about the financial outlook, especially since the TV contract ends in 2028. MCC could still host Hundred matches for a fee without taking an active ownership role in a franchise that may not last.